British judge says Sharia law should be used
In the breathless pursuit of diverse acceptance, UK’s Chief Justice Nicholas Phillips declared that there is nothing wrong with legal matters being dictaed by laws “other than British law.” Golly gosh, I’m so enlightened that I’ll even say my own laws could be nonsense. I guarantee you that although feminists tend to be liberal and/or communist, they (sure as god made little green apples) get off the bus at Sharia law.
This is why I hate liberals and communists (although I would argue in many instances, the line between those two is very blurry). There is this obsession with seeming to be uber-enlightened about all cultures. Lord Phillips is essentially saying that British law is not necessarily better than other laws, Sharia being the comparison in this case. To be fair, he said the Sharia tenets that allow stoning and cutting people’s hands off are not acceptable, but the mere acknowledgment simply accepts the premise that British law is not good enough. He is giving credibility and respect to a despicable, fascist, sexist set of rules made in the stone ages.
Hey Lord Phillips, if Hitler gave money to charity, I don’t think any sane person would go to him as an expert on compassion. Yet, you wanna give jurisprudence to a culture that thinks women shouldn’t be allowed to pray when menstruating or wear whatever clothing they see fit simply because they’re not totally insane when it comes to business contracts. Muslim women aren’t even allowed to wear that stupid wig you Brits still wear. You, sir, are an intellectually lazy moron, and you are a disgrace to the robe and that ridiculous wig. This insane vacuum of logic known as liberalism is killing us slowly. I’m so sick of it.