Archive

Archive for the ‘Mitt Romney’ Category

Countdown to 2012

June 8th, 2009 OAL No comments

I know I may piss off my Republican fans, but the fact of the matter is, the only use I have for Republicans is the opposition to Democrats. Only a Republican can defeat Obama in 2012, but I fear the formula necessary to do it will not be implemented by anyone.

The unfortunate reality is our election for President is now a student body election. Being smart or on the right side of policies matters little if at all. Liberal democrats oppose gay marriage vehemently, yet they didn’t blink when they pulled the lever for Barack Obama.  It could seem reasonable if perhaps they voiced their objection, but voted for him anyway, as many conservatives and Republicans did for John McCain. But the vast majority of Obama voters really did not even acknowledge it. How does that happen?

The Democrat party has been extremely successful in their ability to partition society into groups, aka identity politics. Convince the leadership of a group to only vote for one party, and that leadership will get impressive results. Part of this process has been to convince large amounts of Americans that Republicans are insensitive at best, and vicious bigots at worst.

These generalizations CAN be defeated in political discourse, but the Republican party often refuses to. They opt for short term solutions and screw themselves in the long term. Apologizing for a racial comment would be one example. I didn’t say racIST; I said racIAL. Mentioning a mistake by an individual that happens not to be white is not racist, but many liberals pounce on any racial comment and declare is racist.

A month ago, I would been able to name three people capable of combatting the success of Democrat identity politics. The first would have been Newt Gingrich. He has been more eloquent than most about explaining fiscal conservatism and contrasting it with fiscal liberalism or socialism. In other words, he has had the balls to take the Democrats head on concerning multiple issues. He left his balls at home when he apologized for calling Sonia Sotomayor a racist, which she is. He has proven he can’t go all the way in a long, arduous campaign.

The second person is Dick Cheney. The guy ran circles around Obama a few weeks back concerning interrogation, etc. Just demolished him, despite Keith Olbermann’s best efforts to tell people otherwise. Cheney has been steadfast (as far as I’m aware) about sticking to his guns and not backing down from any debate, even if people call him names. Unfortunately, I fear he has been so damaged by the many myths about him and Halliburton that he is unelectable. I would also file Sarah Palin under this category, at least in the short term. (Update 7/2/09 - Krauthammer agrees with me)

The third person is Mitt Romney. I fear he is the last hope of defeating Obama in 2012. Barack Obama thanks his lucky stars that Romney didn’t get the nomination, because if he had, the economic crash of September would have played right into the hands of Romney, an extremely successful businessman who has shown he knows the economy. I don’t pretend Romney is the biggest expert on the economy. Again, this is a student body presidential election, so he is as close as its gonna get.

Romney has the look, the voice, the gravitas that has a chance with the pop culture vote that Obama courted in 2008. I know Obama supporters that love Romney. Now for anyone out there that follows politics, you might wonder how the hell one person could simultaneously like Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. The answer is simple, albeit irritating. It’s because Presidential elections have ceased to have anything to do with being qualified and having experience. It doesn’t matter that Romney and Obama disagree on virtually every major issue. They’re both likeable to the ignorant masses of voters. Yes, I am calling voters ignorant. Not all of them, just 90% of them.

Romney is the guy. Moral purists like myself will just have to ignore Romney’s occasional flip-flop if they want to replace the Marxist Barack Obama. I think the situation is so dire that the lesser of two evils has become absolutely necessary if we don’t want to spend decades cleaning up Obama’s mess.

There are other people out there who have potential besides Romney, but until they become bigger celebrities, they won’t have a chance against Obama’s pop culture vote. The next Republican has to tap that demographic to have a chance, and Romney is the current front-runner for accomplishing that.

The only other way is to have someone blacker run on the Republican ticket. I’m not in favor of picking a candidate because they’re black, but in the discussion of how to beat Obama, that would be one possible way. Clarence Thomas, Ken Blackwell, JC Watts… I dont know much about Blackwell or Watts, but they’re both young and black enough to grab a lot of 2008 Obama voters. Again, I only point this out in a political context. Come to think of it now… Clarence Thomas would wipe the floor with Obama if there was a snowball’s chance in Al Gore’s melting Arctic that he would step down from his lifetime appointment to be viciously attacked again. He won’t.

Like I said, Romney’s the guy.

Categories: Barack Obama, Mitt Romney Tags:

Who can win (revised)

January 31st, 2008 OAL No comments

Hillary and Obama are both liked by a lot of Americans. I breathed a sigh of relief when Edwards finally got out. He’s crazy, and nobody on the left cares that he is (they’re a little crazy too).

From the last Democrat debate after Hillary and Barack argued with each other: “I also want to know on behalf of voters here in South Carolina, this kind of squabbling, how many children is this going to get health care? How many people are going to get an education from this? How many kids are going to be able to go to college because of this?” Are you serious, John? Did you really just say that out loud? Again, if you buy his kind of nonsense, please leave my website. Now.

Giuliani is backing McCain, I’m sure putting Rudy at the top of the VP list for John. Should have gone to New Hampshire, Rudy.

Ron Paul is… Ron Paul. Great on domestic issues, small government, but just too scary on national defense. He has no chance anyway.

Huckabee appears to be a flash in the Iowan pan. Not gonna win without a miracle, which his consituents have surely contributed their karma to.

McCain, I repeat, is not a conservative. He commented in tonight’s debate about “greedy” people on Wall Street that “perhaps need to be punished.” Uh… folks… this is kooky liberal nonsense. Class warfare, right out of the Edwards playbook. As far as I’m concerned he is disqualified. Done. Anyone that ignores his comment needs to open their mind to him not being the guy.

Romney still hasn’t pissed me off yet. He’s a little too good at public speaking, but his business background speaks for itself. I don’t think he’ll get as much done as he says he will, but none of them will. If Romney knows what’s good for him, he’ll play up that McCain comment, and others, and if people listen, McCain is finished with conservatives.

I predict Rush and others will tear McCain apart tomorrow.

Categories: Election 2008, John McCain, Mitt Romney Tags:

Giuliani and Edwards drop out

January 31st, 2008 OAL No comments

Thank goodness Edwards is officially out. I didn’t think he could win, but as I said in a previous post, he a deceitful, despicable human being who should not even be considered for running the country.

Giuliani dropped out after coming in a distant 3rd in his first actual attempt in the primaries in Florida. Turns out he’s endorsing McCain. McCain is a nice (also hilarious) guy, and I admire his war service, but he is a liberal on many issues. The McCain/Feingold Act restricts ads within 30 days of a primary or 60 days from an election (actually this isn’t liberal, as most liberals support free speech; it’s even worse than liberal). McCain tried to get the amnesty bill passed recently. Here’s a quote from tonight’s debate: “I think there’s some greedy people on Wall Street that perhaps need to be punished.” If this doesn’t make you shudder, you’re either ignorant about capitalism, or you’re against capitalism. He is NOT a conservative by any stretch of the imagination except maybe on defense.

I think McCain will have trouble beating Hillary/Obama. Even if he does, I’m not sure there will be much of a difference.

Who can win the presidency

January 12th, 2008 OAL No comments

Democrats: Clinton, Obama

Republicans: Giuliani, (maybe McCain), Romney, Thompson

Huckabee can’t win. He’s too religious. Romney’s Mormonism won’t matter. Edwards can’t win the general election, too many skeletons. Giuliani and Hillary kind of cancel each other out… any criticism of him can be countered by analyzing her and her hubbie, and barring any setbacks, Rudy probably wins that. He needs to avoid pissing women off. Romney versus one of the dems would probably be a toss-up. He’s a power-hungry politician like Hillary, but I think an efficient-business-like approach to the presidency would be so natural to him, he would do well. He gets things done. Romney and Giuliani (even Huckabee to an extent) have all accomplished concrete things. Clinton, Obama, and Thompson have accomplished nothing substantial. “Fixed,” “saved,” and “reformed” are all verbs that could be applied to Romney and Giuliani, while Obama and Clinton have the verbs “tried” and “fought.” Show me the money.
As for Fred, I see no other candidate that is as well-versed as him. They’re all speaking in one-liners, while Fred goes very in-depth about every subject, which is boring TV, but its what should be running the country. I don’t think Fred will win the nomination because not enough people are listening to him.

If he somehow did win, they would start listening, and he would win handily. While Huckabee is talking about how he brought “hope” to Arkansas children by making sure they had highways, Fred was carefully explaining the boring details of how he would fix problems and run the country.

My rankings:

Thompson
Romney/Giuliani
Clinton
Huckabee
Obama

Why do I rank Clinton ahead of Huckabee? She’ll likely run the country same as Bill, minus Monica. It wasn’t that bad. I don’t trust Huckabee, Obama will probably be a lame duck his whole one term.

Primaries Update: Who’s in, who’s out

January 7th, 2008 OAL No comments

Republican debate last night… my arbitrary grades for the 5 candidates.

Thompson: A
Romney: A-
Giuliani: B
Huckabee: B-
McCain: B-/C+

I don’t think Thompson will be the nominee, but he probably should be. The guy knows his stuff cold, but what sells on T.V. is exciting political speech, which is usually dreck. He puts forth specifics in a much stronger fashion than the other candidates. I suspect Romney and Huckabee know just as much, but they spend more time on one-liners, which is why they’re beating Thompson. Romney was good too, Giuliani is great in general, but he did his usual stat-citing, which is effective, but I’d like to see the questions asked him get answered. Huckabee sucked in direct debate with Romney, Mitt absolutely wiped the floor with him. As for McCain, he seemed wimpy despite having ok answers… it appears someone advised him to back off of Romney. Bad idea.

My rankings for who’s still left (meaning, how I think they will do, not how I think they should):

Democrats
1. Obama
2. Clinton
3. Edwards

Republicans
1. Giuliani
2. Romney
3. Huckabee

Needs Big Results FAST:

McCain (must win in New Hampshire)
Thompson (probably needs a single-digit difference between him and winner)
No chance:

Paul (too defisive, great domestic policy, but suicidal on preventative defense)
Richardson (running for V.P.)