Home > Hollywood, Ignorance, Racism > Shock-jock reporters sacrifice Will Smith for sales

Shock-jock reporters sacrifice Will Smith for sales

December 26th, 2007 OAL Leave a comment Go to comments

The media is out of control. The gap between a reporter and shock jock is narrowing FAST, and in some cases is non-existent. The latest knee-jerk reaction to statements by Will Smith is the perfect example.

In an interview in conjunction with his new movie, I am Legend, the interview steered towards his easy-going nature. Prior to the comment concerning Hitler, Will explained why he was so easy-going:

“Well, if I understand the problem then I don’t get annoyed. People driving past in the car and giving me the finger annoys my wife but it’s because they think you did something to them. They think you’re driving too slow and keeping them from getting to their daughter’s birthday party, or you cut them off and didn’t see.”

Then he used a politically incorrect example of an extremely evil man to prove his point. Smith DID NOT say what Hitler did was good; he said that Hitler most likely THOUGHT he was doing good. The fact that this is what Will Smith meant seems unimportant to the JDL (Jewish Defense League) or shock jock reporters across the world. What Will Smith meant was irrelevant to the reporters who ran with the misrepresentation. “If it bleeds, it leads” is the saying, and the fact that reporters chose to let Smith bleed without regard for reality is sickening to me.

Here’s the quote from the article by Siobhan Synnot of the Daily Record:

“Remarkably, Will believes everyone is basically good.

“Even Hitler didn’t wake up going, ‘let me do the most evil thing I can do today’,” said Will. “I think he woke up in the morning and using a twisted, backwards logic, he set out to do what he thought was ‘good’. Stuff like that just needs reprogramming.”

This is a very logical statement, despite it being about an evil genocidal murderer who deserves no sympathy. This produced response articles with atrocious, reckless headlines:

Will Smith sees the good in Hitler - US actor Will Smith has stunned fans by reportedly declaring that Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler was essentially a “good” person.” - The Australian

I’m gonna make some TRUE statements that will cause a knee-jerk reaction in most of you. Fight the urge and read EXACTLY WHAT I AM SAYING:

  • Adolf Hitler was a tremendously effective public speaker.
  • According to all evidence, Adolf Hitler’s goal was to make the world a better place (be patient, keep reading).

The evil part was his criteria for doing so. Again, Hitler’s goal was to make the world more productive by getting rid of unproductive, evil people. His intentions were NOT evil; his criteria WERE. I feel compelled to be redundant for the sake of clarity: just because his intentions were good does not justify the evil he perpetrated. His crimes were viciously evil and the pinnacle of blind, racist ignorance. He was a psycho whom ignored the fact that some of his favorite musicians and composers were Jewish and decided they all should be exterminated. He was responsible for the death/torture camps like Auschwitz, which killed 75% of its prisoners upon arrival, and used the remaining 25% for free slave labor.

I have nothing but incensed despise for Adolf Hitler, but I will not attack or sit by while someone else is attacked simply because they said one seemingly nice thing about an evil man. Smith was illustrating that there is hope for goodness to spread, even when people like Hitler have existed. The Holocaust happened due to the tremendous ignorance, and speaking ability of Adolf Hitler.

It is completely possible Will Smith hates Jews, but these recent statements aren’t proof of that. The Jewish Defense League should be going after the head of Siobhan Synnot for her deliberate character-arson, and the editor of any newspaper that ran with this without due diligence.

P.S. I understand Will Smith is friends with Tom Cruise, who appears to be a certifiable fruit cake. That worries me a little, but some cursory research seemed to show that Smith seems to be and likes people to know how open-minded he is. He is being overly nice to Scientologists in this pursuit.

Categories: Hollywood, Ignorance, Racism Tags:
  1. Will Smith rocks
    December 27th, 2007 at 10:26 | #1

    Read the Record article and the arson is not the work of Synnot and the Record, who published a soft positive feature about Will’s go-getting attitude. The Hitler quotes seem to be him asserting his belief that people start good but people like Hitler go horrifyingly off-track.
    At no time does the Record say “Hitler is good”. That was the work of a US news agency who have been forced to apologize for sensationalizing a thoughtful article.

  2. January 1st, 2008 at 00:23 | #2

    I agree The Australian poured gasoline on the fire and made it much worse than Synnot, but her framing of Will Smith’s comments were deliberately meant to start a controversy. The Record never said “Hitler is good” nor did I say they did. I agree the article as a whole did focus on his good nature, there’s no doubt about that. “[Smith] believes everyone is basically good.” Then she puts Smith’s comments about Hitler. The juxtaposition is designed to bring out the usual knee-jerk reaction; she should have elaborated.

    Your approach to this is with what I call “due process logic.” Yes, she didn’t make any definitive statement about Smith’s feelings about Hitler, but she purposely remained vague. She didn’t libel him, but she engaged in the usual journalistic fire-setting. Some times, stuff like this is harmless and the fire doesn’t start. In this case, it did.

    Synnot was not deliberately vicious in her inaction… it was her lack of concern for the consequences.

    Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Come back anytime.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.